Alfonso Signorini in no uncertain terms to Big Brother Vip, where he responds to Giucas Casella and an allusion to the abortion of his bitch in a peremptory way. The controversy is guaranteed.
Turn on notifications to receive updates on
“We are against abortion in all its forms”, says Alfonso Signorini in the final part of the November 15 episode of Big Brother Vip. A phrase that threatens to haunt him for the next few weeks. Words that immediately ended up at the center of a whirlwind of condemnation comments on social media, ready to point the finger at the position of the conductor – moreover extended to the whole program – or rather his wavering morality, with an alternation from positions that oscillate dangerously from progressivism to extreme conservatism.
What Alfonso Signorini said about abortion
In this case, a sentence of Giucas Casella to unleash the indisputably heavy exit of the program host. In the wake of the joke to Giucas Casella that has been going on for weeks, that is the mating of his female dog with another large size, Signorini teased the competitor about the possibility of an upcoming litter. Casella refused to accept the idea peacefully and included, in the list of hypotheses, precisely the possibility that the dog, apparently pregnant, could indeed have an abortion. Precisely in response to this came the clarification of Signorini who ignited the debate on social networks: “We are against abortion in all its forms, even that of dogs does not interest us”.
The politically correct and the previous controversies
A controversy that is paired with other controversial statements made by the presenter of Big Brother Vip in this edition of the reality show, starting with what was a bit of the opening manifesto of this edition, relating to the attitude that the production would have adopted with respect to punishments for incorrect sentences and behaviors assumed by competitors at home. Opposing an alleged dictatorship of the politically correct, Signorini had specified that what would count for a punishment in relation to an offense would not be the content, but the intention. A somewhat questionable yardstick, especially due to the difficulty of application and the risk of double standards depending on the circumstances. It will be curious to understand if in the next few days Signorini will back down from his words on abortion, or will remain firm on his positions, denying that he has incorrectly expressed a different concept.
Source: Fanpage by tv.fanpage.it.
*The article has been translated based on the content of Fanpage by tv.fanpage.it. If there is any problem regarding the content, copyright, please leave a report below the article. We will try to process as quickly as possible to protect the rights of the author. Thank you very much!
*We just want readers to access information more quickly and easily with other multilingual content, instead of information only available in a certain language.
*We always respect the copyright of the content of the author and always include the original link of the source article.If the author disagrees, just leave the report below the article, the article will be edited or deleted at the request of the author. Thanks very much! Best regards!