Waiting for stock market crashes to invest is a bad long-term strategy, we tell you why

One of the big questions that savers who want to invest in the stock market have is what is the best way to proceed to obtain the best results Should we be putting money month by month or is it a better alternative to save and later when there is a fall to invest everything saved up to that moment?

Today we resolve this doubt of both long-term investment strategies. But before we begin, we must describe them.

The first alternative tends to be known by dollar cost average (DCA) what part of the idea of invest a fixed amount periodically in the stock marketregardless of whether the market goes up or down.

Buy in falls

Buying in drops translates to periodically saving a certain amount in cash until the market falls below a certain percentage amount from its all-time highs.

Once the market drops enough, a certain percentage from highs, all the cash saved is invested. From there, we periodically invest until the market hits all-time highs. At that time, starting over, we accumulate cash again until the next drop in cash occurs in percentage terms than the previous one.

This tends to be the most used strategy. Just as we buy any item when it is on sale, the same happens with buying from the market when it is down.

We will take the study by Nicolás Maggiulli published in Of dollars and data that runs as follows:

With DCA we invest $ 100 each month for 20 years. In contrast, with the wait-for-dips methodology, we save $ 100 per month until the market falls and all the saved cash is invested and continues to invest $ 100 each month until the market reaches another all-time high. At that point, cash is accumulated again until the next drop of the same size occurs. And so on throughout the 20-year period.

The results observed in all 20-year periods from 1920 to 2020 is that the average profitability of using the strategy of buying on falls for 20 years ranges between -5% and -13% compared to the DCA, depending on the drop threshold to be used.

Screenshot 20211011 002804 Adobe Acrobat

It is unlikely that If we rely on waiting for small falls to enter the market, we will win over the DCA in the long term vs. whether we expect big drops between 1920 and 2020: When using a strategy of entering a 10% to 20% drop threshold, there is a one in four chance of defeating the DCA.

Screenshot 20211011 002506 Adobe Acrobat

DCA is better strategy

If we use a threshold of 50%, the probability of exceeding the DCA increases to almost four out of ten. But this comes at a price because, while you are more likely to exceed the DCA when you use a higher decline threshold, your final profitability will decline more (on average).

This happens because the strategy of waiting for dips to enter, tends to stay in cash too long. Since these monies are not capitalized in the investment, they do not take advantage of the full potential of the market’s long-term interest force.

Source: El Blog Salmón by feeds.weblogssl.com.

*The article has been translated based on the content of El Blog Salmón by feeds.weblogssl.com. If there is any problem regarding the content, copyright, please leave a report below the article. We will try to process as quickly as possible to protect the rights of the author. Thank you very much!

*We just want readers to access information more quickly and easily with other multilingual content, instead of information only available in a certain language.

*We always respect the copyright of the content of the author and always include the original link of the source article.If the author disagrees, just leave the report below the article, the article will be edited or deleted at the request of the author. Thanks very much! Best regards!