New judicial setback for Aena. The airport manager has just received another order from the Court of First Instance number 39 of Madrid, in which it has been decided maintain the precautionary measures adopted in favor of Duty Free last March unprecedented part, that is, without taking into account the opinion of the semi-public company. The main decision is to prevent Aena from executing the guarantees of its tenants and keeping its stores. The restoration firm brought Aena to justice to modify the leasing contracts in force due to the effects that the pandemic had had on passenger traffic at Spanish airports and, ultimately, on the income of its stores.
In a statement sent to the National Securities Market Commission (CNMV), the company chaired by Maurici Lucena explains that there is still time to draw definitive conclusions on the judicial position. “The decision in the first instance on the merits of the matter will probably be adopted by the Court of First Instance throughout the next year 2022”, Aena affirms before the stock market regulator. “The company will appeal to the Provincial Court of Madrid the judicial resolution today,” concludes the company.
Apart from this aspect, the rest of the precautionary measures that the Madrid Court agrees to maintain mainly include the precautionary suspension of the payment of the rent of the contracts of Duty Free, Duty Pay y Retail in what exceeds the agreement that the defendant and plaintiff signed. A bond of 27.47 million euros is also requested from Dufry to respond to the damages that his request may cause to Aena.
Previously, the court of first instance number 39 of Madrid had already accepted the very precautionary requested by the Swiss company Dufry and its partner in the Canary Islands, Canariensis. In this first round, both companies had achieved what is ratified today: preventing the semi-public company from executing the guarantees provided for the rents by the stores at all airports.
Aena defends herself
Again, Aena explains that this order to maintain the precautionary measures does not prejudge the merits of the lawsuit filed. The company proposed to the plaintiffs in January 2021 -as well as to the rest of its tenants- an agreement that entailed a reduction of more than half (56%) of the guaranteed minimum rents (RMGA) in the contracts during the year 2020 .
This car favorable to Aena tenants joins others in the same sense that companies such as the Catalan company have achieved in recent months Areas and SSP, two large clients that contribute to the company approximately more than 150 euros a year in rents.
The president of Aena himself has come out on different occasions to defend his performance. In an interview last April, the top person in charge of the company who had received more favorable responses to his contract modification proposal than negative ones. However, he acknowledged that “there is a great difference between this important volume and what it means in billing for Aena”.
The conflict with the tenants has ruined all Aena’s forecasts. At the beginning of the year, the company’s goal was to earn 750 million euros both from leases to duty-free shops and to restaurants and car rental companies. But the first rejections of his proposal led the company to review these figures.
Source: LA INFORMACIÓN – Lo último by www.lainformacion.com.
*The article has been translated based on the content of LA INFORMACIÓN – Lo último by www.lainformacion.com. If there is any problem regarding the content, copyright, please leave a report below the article. We will try to process as quickly as possible to protect the rights of the author. Thank you very much!
*We just want readers to access information more quickly and easily with other multilingual content, instead of information only available in a certain language.
*We always respect the copyright of the content of the author and always include the original link of the source article.If the author disagrees, just leave the report below the article, the article will be edited or deleted at the request of the author. Thanks very much! Best regards!