The deputies ended the discussion on constructive distrust in the government of Janez Janša with the candidate for prime minister-designate Karel Erjavec. In the concluding part, KUL deputies were heard in particular, who criticized the government and promised a friendlier policy that would respect the rule of law. The SDS accused them of declaring and lacking a program.
Karl Erjavec or Janez Janša?
On the final day of the debate, the deputies were again addressed by the candidate for prime minister, the President of DeSUS Karl Erjavec, and on behalf of the proposers, LMŠ deputy Jani Möderndorfer.
Among other things, Erjavec reiterated that today the deputies will judge whether they agree with the policy of the current government or want one that is more people-friendly, more consistent in decisions, a government that respects the rule of law and human rights and takes into account the profession. . If they do not take advantage of this opportunity today, they will tell the voters what kind of state concept they want.
A voice for him “the voice will not be cast away”, but this voice will lead the country on the right path, among the countries of nuclear Europe, on the path of the countries where it is “the rule of law is sacred, where policing is independent of current politics” and people will not live in such uncertainty, he stated.
According to LMŠ MP Möderndorfer, the representatives of the coalition in the defense of the government did not use arguments, but resorted to personal discrediting. Prime Minister Janez Janša but he was, in his words “every time he became prime minister, worse.”
According to Möderndorfer, statements about how good Janša is as an organizer and how he finds himself in crisis situations are “good night fairy tales”. “But he is a master at creating crisis situations,“he remarked. He called on all deputies who are in a dilemma not to consider whether they will still have a job if the vote of no confidence is taken.
Just before the vote, some other MPs from both sides reiterated their views. Mojca Škrinjar from the SDS, among other things, assessed that the candidate for prime minister has too general a program that is not convincing. Her party colleague Ljubo Žnidar however, he criticized the statement that the opposition had cooperated constructively in the fight against the epidemic, which is not true at all.
Alenka Jeraj from the SDS, by quoting the statements of the presidents of the KUL parties, she hinted that even they do not believe in the candidate for prime minister Erjavec. “And now we are supposed to be persuaded that this proclaimed orchestra should begin to play in unison,” she was skeptical.
On the other hand, he is the leader of the SAB deputies Masha Kociper She attributed frustrations to Janša because of old resentments for doing so “bad prime minister”. MP SD Dejan Zidan however, he pointed out Janša “authoritarian government” and attacks on his political opponents.
Prime Minister Janša was not in the National Assembly at the end of the debate.
Following the debate, a secret ballot is now taking place. The result will be known when the sitting resumes at 9.25 pm. For the proposal to succeed, it must be supported by at least 46 Members.
Eleven deputies from LMŠ, SD, Levice, DeSUS and SAB proposed a constructive no-confidence motion with the proposal to elect DeSUS president Karel Erjavec as prime minister-designate, which is being discussed by the National Assembly at a marathon session today.
Source: Svet24.si by novice.svet24.si.
*The article has been translated based on the content of Svet24.si by novice.svet24.si. If there is any problem regarding the content, copyright, please leave a report below the article. We will try to process as quickly as possible to protect the rights of the author. Thank you very much!
*We just want readers to access information more quickly and easily with other multilingual content, instead of information only available in a certain language.
*We always respect the copyright of the content of the author and always include the original link of the source article.If the author disagrees, just leave the report below the article, the article will be edited or deleted at the request of the author. Thanks very much! Best regards!