The crime of dissent

The crime of dissent

(the crime of opinion, the crime of disagreeing, the illicit act of not blindly obeying, the capital sin of thinking alone and acting freely)

[Pentru cei care preferă limba în care Roger Waters (Pink Floyd) l-a definit pe Mark Z. drept „unul dintre cei mai puternici idioță din lume” – the criminalization (not only the stigmatization or the “simple” demonization) of dissent]

Dissent has always been punished and discouraged in totalitarian systems.

Feisbuc and all other online platforms, trading, instant communication or “socialization”, are already totalitarian systems.

Not only does it routinely collect our behavioral surplus (the “traces” we leave everywhere on the internet or the signals about us that the “smart” things around us constantly emit) to fabricate our will and deviate from our contractual behavior. (engl. – the manufactory of consent, apud Naom Chomsky), but it also separates us in all sorts of bubbles and factions, the non-faction becoming the outcast, the excluded from the so-called “society” free and safe of the subjects. And, that is, Facebook, Twitter, Lynx, etc. are “social” networks…

Dear “community of values” colleagues,

I would like to inform you that we have already passed the second suspension of the Facebook page. The first, executed last week, was for 24 hours. The second, executed from Friday until today, was for 3 days. Given that I now have on my digital avatar’s digital forehead the stamp of recidivism in dissent, dozens of other such sanctions follow, until I retire alone from the “community” of the 11 million Romanian citizens who use Facebook. The tens of thousands of haters who reported me to every post in which I forced them to look like in a mirror that does not hide the wrinkles on their faces and the blackness of their souls, will have found revenge.

The reasons for this progressive punishment are, according to the announcement of the censorship algorithm, some of my posts would violate the “community values” of the 2.7 billion Facebook users.

Here is an example – “YOUR comment did not respect the values ​​of OUR community” (writing in capital letters belongs to me, being meant to highlight the implicit segregation practiced by the “democratic” Facebook). And I am given two examples – one, in which I draw the attention of Facebook censors that the information in the post is official (it was the decision of the Cluj Court of Appeal which removes some articles from the latest government decisions regarding the extension of the alert, articles that introduced discrimination on the basis of vaccination criteria, on the back door), another, in which we quoted and commented on an article in Ziarul Bursa on the risks of the mRNA vaccine in the Canadian press.

Either the censorship algorithms are poorly set, or the Romanian collaborators of fesibuc are politically and ideologically indoctrinated – otherwise I can’t explain how such documented texts can be marked as being against the “values ​​of the community” feisbuc.

On the other hand, for reasonable and humorous people, it is “obvious” that the values ​​of the 2.7 billion people (the “Facebook community” on whose behalf Facebook speaks, when trying to justify its totalitarian measures) can be reduced. to an arbitrary, non-transparent, unknown and, above all, unacceptable list (except for the 20-30 globalist NGOs and the few “personalities” who equate progress with ritual kneeling before an organization that has confiscated a legitimate cause, anti-racism) of 10 values. It is the most Chinese way to flatten man, to bring him to the lowest common denominator, to make him submit with a smile on his face to the most absurd reactions of rejection of doubt, of facts, of truth, in favor of “information full of lies and misinformation.

Personally, I will not accept this totalitarian nonsense.

I will sue feisbuc to hold him accountable and punish him.

Much more important, however, is that Facebook must be punished judicially for censorship during the pandemic, for the misinformation practiced, for the fake news by omission that infested society and destroyed the idea of ​​journalism and liberalism, and for openly supporting conflicting impostors and technocrats, who made money and gained discretion over the world, while being paid Big Pharma and Big Tech soldiers and high-ranking public health officials. For fact checkers: feisbuc has decided, after more than a year of official censorship, to stop blocking and marking as dangerous the posts and comments that raise doubts about the natural origin of the coronavirs as the theory that the virus is artificial and was “involuntarily” dropped from the laboratory in Wuhan, China.

I am also going to notify the competition and personal data protection bodies to punish economic crimes and the current theft of parts of our human condition (behavioral surplus, collected by facebook with every click or scroll on the page), committed by facebook , with the help of their political leaders, to make money continents and puppet theaters where we are the puppets.

For the second and third action, I invite you all to be parties – although it would be desirable, it does not necessarily have to be a class action. Advertising can also be done, individual petitions, anti-advertising on other online platforms, draft laws or regulations online, civic / political action, etc.

Of course, many will say that Facebook is too big to be sued, too strong to be bothered by mosquito bites, too important for the secret services to be left to fend for themselves. But our silence would fuel the ongoing bullying of these neo-Nazis.

On the other hand, some will have wondered, of course, why posts that always refer to facts, public reports and scientific studies, articles in the mainstream stream, etc. they were able to enter the collimator of the Facebook censors.

I have a simplistic explanation and a difficult one.

Simply put, it can be suspected that the Romanian “specialists” to whom Facebook outsourced the censorship “services” are my political or ideological opponents, although I (still) do not do politics. One argument is that a dean of SNSPA used his own NGO (Eurocommunication) and his students to issue a report on fake pandemic news on Facebook. Nothing in the report (which puts me first on the list of dissidents) is factually or scientifically justified – just progressive propaganda and ideology. (note – I sued that NGO and SNSPA, for moral damages, having a first term in September 2021, one year after the appearance of the “report”…).

Unsimplistically, the explanation is related to the totalitarian character of Facebook. Dissent must be punished, and I am already a repeat offender. I’m not a VIP, I’m an unimportant person, I’m like you, an ordinary individual of this society – the fact that I have 95,000 “followers” on Facebook means nothing. There are VIPs who are subject to the right policy, “community standards” and the right cat and who have hundreds of thousands or even millions of “followers”, and Facebook does not limit them in the extension of messages (reach) and does not punish them for violating the true values ​​of society – family, home, future, the emotional and psychological integrity of children, respect for seniors, faith. But, as far as I’m concerned, it was essential for the professionals of manipulation and for the censorship and propaganda bodies to be punished, in order to ensure the deterrent effect – do not act like the dissident Piperea because you will suffer like him.

Finally, I suggest that those who have not yet read George Orwell’s 1984 dystopian novel hurry – such books on Big Brother and dissent may soon be banned and burned. To those who have already read the book, I suggest rereading page 25, which describes the weekly show of 2 minutes of hate. The enemy no. 1, which the spectators had to hate and manifest in such a way as to see hatred, that is, to signal their virtue signaling to hate him, was called Goldstein. Right now, je suis Goldstein. The next public enemy no. 1 can be you. Any of you.

Source: Cotidianul RO by

*The article has been translated based on the content of Cotidianul RO by If there is any problem regarding the content, copyright, please leave a report below the article. We will try to process as quickly as possible to protect the rights of the author. Thank you very much!

*We just want readers to access information more quickly and easily with other multilingual content, instead of information only available in a certain language.

*We always respect the copyright of the content of the author and always include the original link of the source article.If the author disagrees, just leave the report below the article, the article will be edited or deleted at the request of the author. Thanks very much! Best regards!