Pro-ecological referendum – commentary by Ioan Buduca

Philippe de Villiers și Emmanuel Macron

President Macron wants referendum to enshrine state obligation to promote pro-environmental policies in French constitution. The problem, however, is that in France, those who believe that global warming is propaganda seem to gather more than 50 percent of voters. The informed Frenchman believes it is understood that the reduction in petrol consumption is related to the world’s oil reserves, which are only enough for another 50 years, rather than to the greenhouse effect of carbon dioxide emissions.

Most carbon dioxide emissions come from the respiration of more than seven billion human inhabitants on the planet. The only risk involved in these emissions would be that there is not enough vegetation on the planet to process the poisonous gas that is carbon dioxide to release oxygen from the CO.2. Without the oxygen emitted by plants, Earth would be a planet of anaerobic species. Therefore, the disappearance of forests would be a greater ecological crime than the toxicity that occurs through the exhaust pipes.

Propaganda on global warming has played a role in stimulating the production of electric cars. On the other hand, he convinced the oil industrial complex to rethink its future plans so that the transition to the post-oil era would be as smooth as possible.

There are enough ecological problems in the world. Non-propaganda environmentalism now faces the reduction of unpolluted water resources. This problem will knock on our door faster than the result of the much-trumpeted melting of glaciers. Until it produces irreversible effects in the ozone layer at the edge of the Earth’s atmosphere, pollution damages the Earth’s waters. Environmentalists have, for the time being, strictly materialistic visions. Those who accept that the planet is an organism and have a particular cosmic life define life as something that has its origin in the living, although they know the origin of coal and crude oil: the life of a vegetation from a very distant past.

When they accept the generality of life-life succession, they will cease to believe in the power of life to create life. Then, environmentalism will be on the brink of some shocking revelations: for example, that the Resurrection took place for the salvation of mankind from the bodies of the earth, but also for the salvation of the planet Earth as a living cosmic organism. The salvation of the planet? Yes, this fact from the distant future is related in the text of Revelation and has the aspect of the ability of earthly minerals to manifest their vitality through their own light emissions, not only by the reflection of sunlight.

Yes, environmentalism is the “place” in our consciences where it is possible to harmonize religion-science. The false spirits of history (which are also spirits of falsification) have taken over the evolutionary meaning of this harmonization and put it at the press of a materialism that chooses the nevi (mechanical, technological, cyborgic) as the basis for the future. Mankind of that future would have nothing to expect from the resurrection, and Christianity would be one of robots, despite the saying, “I do not call you slaves, but friends.”

The angel, yes, here is a perfectly robotic community, without freedom. The meaning of freedom that has been promised to man is a deep spiritual one: a friend of the Creator, able to participate without luciferic falsifications in the next works of Creation. The new class of Luciferians was called, in anthroposophy, ahrimanism (on grounds that will not remain unknown for long).

Bill Gates’s ecological plans, insistently revealed to the public, are the most clearly false (ahrimanic), namely because they hide, for example, how much pollution we produce to reach a certain production of electric cars and how much air pollutant results from battery production for these cars.

Source: Cotidianul RO by

*The article has been translated based on the content of Cotidianul RO by If there is any problem regarding the content, copyright, please leave a report below the article. We will try to process as quickly as possible to protect the rights of the author. Thank you very much!

*We just want readers to access information more quickly and easily with other multilingual content, instead of information only available in a certain language.

*We always respect the copyright of the content of the author and always include the original link of the source article.If the author disagrees, just leave the report below the article, the article will be edited or deleted at the request of the author. Thanks very much! Best regards!