The US House Committee on Energy and Commerce has sent a letter to Apple asking for more information on the process of verifying the privacy labels on the App Store.
According to he claims the Committee, app privacy labels can sometimes be misleading or blatantly wrong. One reporter, for example, using specialized software, found that about a third of apps that claimed not to collect data had an inaccurate label.
Apple requires developers to provide information about the data collected by each application, but the developers would send this information to an automated system without Apple verification. Apple, on the other hand, said that it regularly checks the information provided and works with developers to correct any inaccuracies
In fact, the Committee asks Apple to improve the validity of the labels so as to guarantee consumers the real significant information on the privacy side.
In detail, Apple was asked, among other things, to provide:
- Details about the process by which the privacy information provided by the developers is verified and how often the verifications are conducted
- How many controlled applications have provided inaccurate or misleading information
Apple has two weeks to process a response and provide all necessary data to the Chamber’s Energy and Commerce Committee.News
Source: iPhone Italia by www.iphoneitalia.com.
*The article has been translated based on the content of iPhone Italia by www.iphoneitalia.com. If there is any problem regarding the content, copyright, please leave a report below the article. We will try to process as quickly as possible to protect the rights of the author. Thank you very much!
*We just want readers to access information more quickly and easily with other multilingual content, instead of information only available in a certain language.
*We always respect the copyright of the content of the author and always include the original link of the source article.If the author disagrees, just leave the report below the article, the article will be edited or deleted at the request of the author. Thanks very much! Best regards!