Netflix, you have a problem and it’s not the shared accounts or (only) the price: it’s the content

They must not be having a good time in the offices of Netflix: the announcement in the reporting first quarter 2022 results that they have lost 200,000 subscribers for the first time in a decade has led to a tremendous stock market crash of about 25% of the value of its shares. Netflix has already initiated a couple of emergency plans. First, with a battery of cheaper subscriptions with advertising. Second, putting an end to the bargain of unlimited account sharing.

Family subscriptions with four simultaneous connections have long been a real bargain due to the laxity with which Netflix allowed millions of users to share an account outside the home of the main subscriber. The figure: more than 100 million households are watching Netflix without paying what they should (30 million in the US and Canada, according to Variety). Here we have explained how Netflix detects this unauthorized use and how the new sub-accounts will work.

But it gives the impression that this problem, already commented on by Netflix itself, is just the tip of the iceberg: there is a clear problem with the image of the company itself, against which its own strategy has played to be the one that makes the most pitches, all the time, continuously. His overwhelming schedule of releases, which led him to release 79 films a month in 2020 (and has not slowed down since then) has ended up imposing the widespread belief, confirmed by the evidence, that not everything has the same quality.

It does not matter that Netflix has openly declared that it is going to focus on improving the quality of its releases. It doesn’t matter that for some time the platform has made an effort to be more transparent with its viewing figures, leaving behind the confusing criterion that a couple of minutes was enough to count as a full viewing. Because there may be a certain general feeling that Netflix is ​​a content churrería, where quantity prevails over quality.

more people in the room

The point is that things have changed with respect to the times when Netflix announced that volume of releases. To begin with, the most obvious: the competition. Although at the moment no one overshadows the huge number of subscribers on the platform, Disney + and HBO Max are not only on its heels in terms of the number of subscribers. It is that their catalogs are tremendously competitive: Disney + has Pixar, Marvel and Star Wars, plus its dean arsenal of productions and franchises. And in HBO Max, Warner is one of the few production companies that remain devoted to blockbuster cinematographic (there are ‘Dune’ and ‘The Batman’ to corroborate it) and has the entire catalog of DC heroes, in addition to the television prestige of HBO.

And the rest are not exactly resting on their laurels. Just yesterday Prime Video announced that it will simultaneously release the entire Bond franchise with the arrival of May, and the strength of the catalog background that the acquisition of MGM gives it is not insignificant. Against all this, Netflix is ​​running out of millionaire franchises (perhaps the transfer to Disney+ of the series with Marvel characters that it treasured until recently and that gave it so much prestige and success years ago is the perfect symbol of the end of an era).

Netflix has a few powerful and genuinely own properties left, such as ‘Stranger Things’, ‘The Crown’, ‘Money Heist’ or ‘The Bridgertons’. His attempts to open franchises in feature film format, such as ‘Red Alert’ meet (they affirm) with the support of the public, but except exceptional cases such as ‘Roma’ or ‘The Irishman’, do not completely rid themselves of their airs of TV-movies with steroids. They are not his only successes, but with many others, such as ‘Arcane’ or ‘The Squid Game’, the idea of ​​surprise success prevails, of hits that take the platform itself by surprise.

match

The problem of episode bingeing

The situation is rounded off with a controversial topic that is not talked about much, but that is part of the very DNA of Netflix: el binge-watching, the appearance of entire seasons on the same day of the premiere. It is a tactic that facilitates mass conversation at first, but soon leads the viewer’s attention to go in another direction. You just have to compare how the Marvel series of Disney + or the most striking premieres of HBO Max perform compared to the exhausting avalanche of tweets that Netflix series generate … the first weekend.

The binge-watching reinforces that idea of ​​”content dumper, regardless of its quality”, and that almost all its competitors have been abandoning. It is easy to compare with, perhaps, the platform whose perception is diametrically opposite: Apple TV +. More or less like their series, their technical finish and the feeling that they come to light when they are finished and not to cover a demanding schedule of constant releases gives the platform a very different prestige. His last big premiere, ‘Severance’, has benefited from those weekly premieres: not only has it benefited the rhythm and development of the story, but it has been talked about twice, in its surprising premiere and in the conclusion of the season, nine weeks apart.

Limitations to shared accounts: the lace

The only thing that remains to be seen is whether the split account limitations will make Netflix’s situation better or worse. Because it is going to force many subscribers to consider whether they are really interested in Netflix content. Now many people who watch Netflix because they have it thanks to a friend or relative who is a subscriber will be forced to take the step of subscribing or choosing which platform they are really interested in.

Either one or the other, suppose a leap into the void for Netflix, which is too immersed in the vicious circle of your own schedule (now you can’t delete the binge-watching, or halve the pace of releases) to back off. Netflix has to stay Netflix, but with the ban on shared accounts… will that be enough?


Source: Xataka by www.xataka.com.

*The article has been translated based on the content of Xataka by www.xataka.com. If there is any problem regarding the content, copyright, please leave a report below the article. We will try to process as quickly as possible to protect the rights of the author. Thank you very much!

*We just want readers to access information more quickly and easily with other multilingual content, instead of information only available in a certain language.

*We always respect the copyright of the content of the author and always include the original link of the source article.If the author disagrees, just leave the report below the article, the article will be edited or deleted at the request of the author. Thanks very much! Best regards!