The 2nd Joint Discussion Meeting for Oh Se-Hwan Oh, Se-Hun Oh, Kyung-won Na, and Eun-Hee Cho
‘Big 2’me-oh nervous war… Fierce battle over unification of candidates and ideology
Cho Eun-hee and Na Gyeong-won “Oh Se-hoon, is there another referendum?”
I am “a longevity tree that a longevity fleeing in 2011 fought
Oh “There’s a lot of hardship in the 4th line”
|[서울=뉴시스]National reporters’ team = Shin-Hwan Oh (from left), Eun-hee Cho, Kyung-won Na, Se-hoon Oh, People’s Strength Preliminary candidates for the Mayor of Seoul are taking a commemorative photo at the Channel A People’s Strength, Seoul Mayor’s Contest. . 2021.02.26. [email protected]|
At the joint debate on candidates for the contest, which was broadcast live through Channel A on the 26th, the two clashed over political issues such as this ideology and philosophy rather than pledges or policies.
Former lawmaker Oh Shin-hwan and Ward Mayor Cho Eun-hee were so checked against the influential finalists that most of the time allotted to them was devoted to the’Big 2’attack.
Mayor Cho, who took the initiative to speak for the first time, took the remarks of former Mayor Oh’s remarks in the past for the’Relocation of the Administrative Capital’.
“In a lecture in July of last year, Candidate Oh said that he was positively considering the transfer of the administrative capital. Two days later, he asked Facebook to move not only the legislature but also the judiciary.” “Is there any change in my thoughts?” The referendum is a painful part of Mayor Oh, who resigned from the mayor of Seoul 10 years ago.
In addition to this, former lawmakers also struck the mayor, saying, “It is important to have urban competitiveness as a capital city. Then, has the administrative capital changed its previous position? The stance of putting it on the referendum is reversed.”
Oh, the former mayor said, “I’m not talking about a referendum. It’s not a referendum issue. (I don’t remember talking about it). It’s not a referendum issue. It’s about asking for opinions on the issue. I do a public opinion poll and take a position in the direction the citizens want. Going is the mayor of Seoul’s duty.”
Rep. Na criticized Mayor Oh’s argument that a’political decision’ is necessary in relation to the unification of opposition candidates.
He said, “It should be unified for the citizens and by the citizens, but if you hear something wrong by political decision, it seems to mean a back-end deal or political collusion. What I think of is the appearance of Ahn Chul-soo and Park Won-soon in 2011. The picture is that photo There is a concern that it will be released in 2021.”
Regarding this, Mayor Oh refuted, saying, “You have to unite your hearts to be unified, and when you become unified, the support layer will move.”
The two men’s discourse on unification shifted to the conservative-central ideological debate.
“I saw an interview with Candidate Oh yesterday that it was difficult to unify. What does it mean?” said Mayor Oh, “It’s a misunderstanding in the context of the front and back. The question is,’Is Na Kyung-won falling halfway through?’ The point of my answer is that it is difficult to beat Ahn Chul-soo if it is unified,” he explained.
I, a former lawmaker, said, “You keep telling me in a dichotomous way that it is gang-gyeong-conservative,” and Oh, the former mayor replied, “Don’t I call it the true color of conservative while talking about jajangmyeon and champon.”
Then candidate Na said, “I am a conservative politician.” Said.
Oh, the former mayor is also stubborn with this, “It is true that you have to fight when fighting. I agree to speak at Gwanghwamun because the Moon Jae-in regime is a prosperous regime,” he said. “That’s not why I said it was a conservative gang. “Because the candidate did it, I said it would be difficult if I couldn’t catch it halfway in this election.”
He emphasized, “My belief is that the Uri Party should be a center-right that supports and harmonizes people in need through the leadership of their mother.”
Regarding this, a former congressman said, “Candidate Oh always referred to me as Kang-kyung conservative, taking into account the over-the-counter struggle, and at the last debate, I said that I did not get the in-house representative. Yes. I blame the longevity who fought the longevity who fleeed in 2011,” he asked.
Rep. Oh, who watched the debate between the two, pointed out that “the order for unification is to judge Moon Jae-in’s regime and the opposition to win, and the battles of the two can be a risk to break the unification.”
“The talk of preventing reverse selection can be an obstacle to unification for the expansion of the middle class, and it is dangerous because Oh Se-hoon’s political discourse can be another obstacle.” We have to go with a unity to win.”
At the debate on this day, the candidates were given a time to praise each other, but the nerve war between the two was still there.
Former Mayor Oh referred to the’hard-line struggle’ to the former lawmaker, saying, “As a treasure of the party, I had a hard time with the 4th choice, and I had a lot of hardships for the lending. I have a deep and strong fellow with my 4th choice.”
I, former lawmaker, praised Mayor Cho and former lawmaker Oh as “a strong young politician” and “a lot of delicate pledges to learn,” but did not mention the former mayor of Oh as the relationship was exhausted.
Mayor Cho said to me, “It encompasses people in a strong yet delicate manner. Korean Merkel came out.” Oh said to the former mayor, “If I have an actor’s sensitivity, Candidate Oh is the author’s sensitivity.” There is this. I have a young sense of reading the times,” he added.
Source: 뉴시스 속보 by www.newsis.com.
*The article has been translated based on the content of 뉴시스 속보 by www.newsis.com. If there is any problem regarding the content, copyright, please leave a report below the article. We will try to process as quickly as possible to protect the rights of the author. Thank you very much!
*We just want readers to access information more quickly and easily with other multilingual content, instead of information only available in a certain language.
*We always respect the copyright of the content of the author and always include the original link of the source article.If the author disagrees, just leave the report below the article, the article will be edited or deleted at the request of the author. Thanks very much! Best regards!