Illustrative photo.Photo: Liis Treimann
The Estonian construction company Merko Ehitus has challenged in an administrative court a fine of 2.7 million euros, which the Latvian Competition Council had assigned to its subsidiary Merks for an alleged cartel conspiracy. rus.err.ee.
The firms Merks and Merko Ehitus appealed against the Competition Council’s decision in the Latvian administrative court on September 13, the construction concern said.
Merks considers the conclusions of the Competition Council regarding the commercial activities of the enterprise to be unfounded, both from a factual and a legal point of view.
The decision of the Competition Council adopted in August provides for the payment of a fine in the amount of 5.4% of SIA Merks’ revenues in 2020, that is, a total of 2,688,950.79 euros. According to the decision, Merko Ehitus, as a parent company, will be jointly and severally liable if Merks fails to fulfill its obligations.
The entrepreneurs split into two groups, trying to distribute tenders so that the amounts were more or less the same. At the meetings, they also discussed the possible winner of the tender, the right to participate in the competition, or, conversely, refusal from it.
Ieva Šmite, Director of the Department of Investigation of Prohibited Agreements of the Investigative Committee, said that the cartel members participated in at least 70 purchases for a total of 686 989 991 euros.
To order alerts, please log into your personal account:
Source: https://www.dv.ee/ by www.dv.ee.
*The article has been translated based on the content of https://www.dv.ee/ by www.dv.ee. If there is any problem regarding the content, copyright, please leave a report below the article. We will try to process as quickly as possible to protect the rights of the author. Thank you very much!
*We just want readers to access information more quickly and easily with other multilingual content, instead of information only available in a certain language.
*We always respect the copyright of the content of the author and always include the original link of the source article.If the author disagrees, just leave the report below the article, the article will be edited or deleted at the request of the author. Thanks very much! Best regards!