The arrest warrant for Jo Woo-hyung, who is suspected of being the actual owner of No. 6 of ‘Chunhwa Dongin’, an affiliate of Hwacheon Daeyu Asset Management (Hwacheon Daeyu), a private business operator, was dismissed by the prosecution, who is investigating the suspicion of the development of Daejang-dong.
Jo Woo-hyung, who is suspected of being the actual owner of Cheonhwa-dongin No. 6, a private developer of Daejang-dong development company Hwacheon Daeyu Asset Management, attends a pre-arrest interrogation (warrant review) held at the Seoul Central District Court in Seocho-gu on the morning of the 4th. [이미지출처=연합뉴스]view original icon
On the 4th, Lee Min-soo, chief judge in charge of warrants at the Seoul Central District Court, interrogated the suspect before the arrest of Mr. The claim was dismissed.
Judge Lee said, “The charge of breach of trust under the Specific Economic Crimes Act is Lee Jae-myeong and Dong-gyu Yoo, who were listed as accomplices, have already been charged with crimes related to the same facts, and a separate criminal trial is underway. here Many of them are on trial without detention.”
At the same time, it seems that it will take a long time until the related trial is concluded in the future. In this case, where issues such as whether the suspect and those related to the crime were constituted, the specific contribution between the accomplices, and the calculation of the amount of damages, etc., there is a need for the suspect to be tried without detention for a faithful trial.”
also “Considering the progress of the trial of the related case and the current status of the evidence collected or to be collected regarding the crimes in this case, it is difficult to see that the need to arrest the suspect is recognized at this stage.” This presiding judge Explained.
On the 1st, the 3rd anti-corruption investigation division of the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office (Chief Prosecutor Kang Baek-sin) requested an arrest warrant. According to the prosecution, in the course of the Daejang-dong development project in March and April 2015, Mr. Cho used official secrets such as information on the opening of the Seopangyo Tunnel to raise initial business funds. , accused of causing damages of 489.5 billion won to the Seongnam Urban Development Corporation.
This is the same as the criminal facts listed in the indictments of private developers in Daejang-dong, such as Kim Man-bae and Nam-wook.
In addition, Mr. Cho is also accused of concealing criminal proceeds by receiving 28.3 billion won in dividend profits from the account of Cheonhwa Dongin No. 6 from March 2019 to March 2021 while actually owning Cheonhwa Dongin No. .
The prosecution determined that Mr. Cho was the actual owner of Cheonhwa-dong Inn No. 6 based on the statements of private operators, but Mr. Cho is said to deny the facts.
Reporter Kim Dae-hyun [email protected]
Top news you must seeThe twins are ‘good luck’… Childbirth subsidy ‘100 million won’ family, full… mask area
Source: 아시아경제신문 실시간 속보 by www.asiae.co.kr.
*The article has been translated based on the content of 아시아경제신문 실시간 속보 by www.asiae.co.kr. If there is any problem regarding the content, copyright, please leave a report below the article. We will try to process as quickly as possible to protect the rights of the author. Thank you very much!
*We just want readers to access information more quickly and easily with other multilingual content, instead of information only available in a certain language.
*We always respect the copyright of the content of the author and always include the original link of the source article.If the author disagrees, just leave the report below the article, the article will be edited or deleted at the request of the author. Thanks very much! Best regards!