It is neither the right nor the limit of Fatih Altaylı to question the local and national identity of EMRA.

ANSWER TO FATIH ALTAYLI

In the statement, it was stated that journalist Fatih Altaylı’s article on “haberturk.com” “directly targets the institution with baseless and hearsay information” and noted the following:

“As it is known, the basic principle of journalism is not to make one-sided news or comments when it comes to any claim, and to seek the opinions of all relevant parties. Unfortunately, Fatih Altaylı did not meet with a single official from our institution regarding his allegations, so it turned out to be unilateral. There has been an article full of mistakes and errors. It is neither the right nor the limit of Fatih Altaylı to question the local and national identity of both EMRA and the Turkish judiciary. First of all, the main purpose of unlicensed electricity production is to generate electricity easily and sell it to the state, making it a source of income in an easy way. The regulation mentioned in the article is not a sudden decision and there has been no change in principle in this regard.”


Source: A HABER by www.ahaber.com.tr.

*The article has been translated based on the content of A HABER by www.ahaber.com.tr. If there is any problem regarding the content, copyright, please leave a report below the article. We will try to process as quickly as possible to protect the rights of the author. Thank you very much!

*We just want readers to access information more quickly and easily with other multilingual content, instead of information only available in a certain language.

*We always respect the copyright of the content of the author and always include the original link of the source article.If the author disagrees, just leave the report below the article, the article will be edited or deleted at the request of the author. Thanks very much! Best regards!