Go Min-jung “attends the meeting of the watchdog committee. Attempt to take control” VS People’s power “Can’t even distinguish it from listening”

Regarding the fact that the People’s Power officials attended the broadcast review meeting of the Korea Communications Standards Commission (Censorship Committee), the Democratic Party insisted that they attended with the intention of taking control of broadcasting, while the People’s Power refuted that various stakeholders could attend and held a battle. unfolded

At the Supreme Council meeting on the 24th, Ko Min-jeong, the Democratic Party’s supreme council member, said, “The Yoon Seok-yeol regime and the ruling party’s attempt to take control of the media is literally a dog.” claimed.

He then pointed out that “the Censorship Committee is the most important institution to secure independence from political influence,” and “it was confirmed that the People’s Power Officers attended 5 general meetings of the Censorship Committee and 9 subcommittee meetings.”

In addition, he pointed out, “Since February, it has not been missed even once, and people’s power officials have participated in all meetings.”

He continued, “The fact that a specific political party official is attending all meetings and watching can itself put pressure on the vigilant member who makes fairness their life.” It was confirmed in the meeting minutes that he was making a political statement.”

He said, “Is the next goal of the Yoon Seok-yeol regime’s roadmap to dominate broadcasting, which is an irrational number despite legal and procedural controversies, dismissal of the Korea Communications Commission Chairman Han Sang-hyuk? Is the next goal of the Vigilante Commission?” As if it was hit, the regime’s attempt to create ‘Thank You News’ will call for national resistance and return as a boomerang to the regime.”

In response, the People’s Power Media Bureau issued a statement and said, “The high commissioner made a mistake again,” and “caught an unexpected fault. He refuted that it was an ignorant decision that failed to distinguish between attending and listening.”

The Media Bureau emphasized that there is no problem with the attendance of party secretariat officials based on the ‘rules on the disclosure of surveillance committee meetings, etc.’ and explained, “In fact, various stakeholders such as reporters, broadcasters, and businessmen are attending the surveillance committee meeting.”

He then asked back, “The very purpose of allowing the hearing is to accept national surveillance for unfair deliberation.”

In addition, he said, “It can’t be that the thief acted voluntarily,” and said, “If you are so worried that a party official was attending, I recommend that the late Supreme Commissioner directly attend.”

He said, “You can see the breath of injustice by looking at the activities of some of the vigilance members who make left-leaning political remarks and prevent remarks on the issue of Kim Eo-jun and Joo Jin-woo and violations of deliberation every time.” There would have been no reason,” he criticized.

Furthermore, “The Democratic Party and the late supreme council member should reflect on the fact that they made the Censorship Committee into the ‘Broadcast Control Command’ of the leftist forces,” he said. said

Finally, he emphasized, “The power of the people will not dwell on the live house, but will become the eyes and ears of the people and closely examine the guard.”

Reporter Kim Soo-yeon [email protected]

[ⓒ 세계일보 & Segye.com, 무단전재 및 재배포 금지]