Disgrace of the Confederation. Enslaved by their own ideas

You can read the note in 4 minutes, it has 2 pages.

Meta, because that is the name of the conglomerate ruling Facebook since October, removed the dynamically developing Confederation profile. Vigorously – because he managed to accumulate less than 700,000 likes, outclassing the competition in social media (for comparison, PiS currently has 312,000 and KO a total of 451,000 likes). Confederation was successful in social networks, put a lot of work to keep its electorate up to date, apparently the algorithm was also favorable to her, but this is not the most important thing now.

Facebook cited the cause of this callous violation ban on the spread of hatred and finally on the disinformation it was supposed to have committed about the coronavirus. The popular “Konfa” went against the tide, opposed the freezing of the economy, questioned the operation of vaccines and masks. The content she spread might have slowed down the vaccination process of our population. This is how Meta justified her decision:

“We removed the Confederation website due to repeated violations of our COVID-19 disinformation policy, in particular false claims that masks do not contain disease spread, that the death rate of COVID-19 is the same or lower than that of influenza, and that COVID-19 vaccines provide no immunity and are ineffective “

But even that’s not the most important thing, it might as well be a completely unjustified whim of the rich at the top or a distortion of the algorithm that blocks and deletes a lot of comments and accounts every day. Suppose it was so, and that the Confederacy did nothing of the sort, and if it did, it wasn’t wrong at all. Let’s assume that she did not accept the regulations and started using the website that gives her presence and the forum.

You don’t like it? So change it! (or create your own)

Confederates divide – which is constantly visible from time to time, for example in discussions on Twitter – between liberals with yellow blood like Gadsden’s flag, who are driven by freedom at every level, and between nationalists and monarchists, i.e. the braunists of the KKP and the National Movement. They already put something above freedom, the good of the nation, in the name of which this and that could be subdued. However, they have something in common.
If you complain about your job that you have to screw up in it and the boss uses tricks that can avoid you, or does not respect them at all, you work for pennies, such a liberal will tell you to change your job. A crowning argument, because after all, we have a market economy and there are so many companies, change it if it does not suit you. Or wear yours at all, then you’ll be the boss and be good. The market will verify. Simple as a wire, right?
You know not, but let’s move on. In turn, when you tell a nationalist that something does not suit you in the country that is supposed to protect you, he will say “it does not suit you? Then leave!” Easy? Well not.

And such rhetoric, as befits a liberal, was adopted by the member of the Confederation Artur Dziambor, who defended corporations that they can make forums that provide people with whatever they like:

In the subject we are discussing here, we are focusing on this ideologically liberal wing of “Konfa”. It is they who defend the free market, that the employer can take care of his company, throw away what and whom he wants, and you, komuch, you want to take his freedom!

The free market has verified me – this is literally communism

But when they become “victims”, a lamp lights up and something begins to not suit them … Then the tentacles of hypocrisy come out of the liberals. Then they spit on ideals that they fiercely defended before, when the problem did not concern them. This is when the rebellion against bad corporations sealing their lips begins (at this point there is a spark of hope in my heart that they will go down this path in the long run). Liberals then become so frustrated that they define the activities of the free market as communism.
No, I’m not making up:

Anyone who knows me knows that I have a tendency to anti-capitalism – no wonder the first paragraph of this flip looks really good. I would sign up. The real salto mortale begins in the second part. To be clear, Parler was – and in theory still is, you can open an account on it – an alternative to media monopolists, where there is to be no censorship and limitless freedom of speech. It just didn’t break through despite its sizeable potential, and was crushed by larger corporations that are unchallenged at the top of the social media industry. Yes, the free market worked, he verified it, as libertarians themselves say, and then this party KORWiN comes and cries that this is not a free market, but “communism of huge corporations”. I will not comment on this aphorism, but to you, dear reader, I will leave something to say. Here’s a place to laugh or figure out how much IQ you’ve just lost by reading these scribbles.

Source: Salon24.pl: Strona główna by www.salon24.pl.

*The article has been translated based on the content of Salon24.pl: Strona główna by www.salon24.pl. If there is any problem regarding the content, copyright, please leave a report below the article. We will try to process as quickly as possible to protect the rights of the author. Thank you very much!

*We just want readers to access information more quickly and easily with other multilingual content, instead of information only available in a certain language.

*We always respect the copyright of the content of the author and always include the original link of the source article.If the author disagrees, just leave the report below the article, the article will be edited or deleted at the request of the author. Thanks very much! Best regards!