Meanwhile, I have not participated in any trial but in three conversations.
With Occhetto who said he was surprised and embittered. On my own I told him that it could be excluded that there had been malice (witness W. Veltroni)
With Meta, of which you will know
With Morelli who told me that the Repubblica article was a hoax but that he disagrees with Occhetto. And I argued with him on the merits. No trial, no conviction. I have some observations though. If you want we can talk about it together.
Excuse me Goffredo,
but I find your somewhat resentful tone curious. Let’s summarize the facts. An article for Repubblica with that relief is published
and that title. We have neither done nor said anything as a management team other than talking about it and commenting among ourselves. Allow me to say that it was you who had to explain to Achilles on Monday morning and not him who had to give them to you.
The turning point decreed by Achille Occhetto was a political act with a great impact on human relations. With violent clashes even on a personal level. As Goffredo Bettini recalls
On the merits. No one disputes the right to discuss theses and claims that are meant to be discussed and are not the Ten Commandments. But there is a need for clarity. With that article, Occhetto made a certain political and cultural operation to respond to the socialists by relaunching a terrain of challenge on the perspectives and values of the left. Is this choice right or not?
If yes, it must be said, perhaps by objecting to this or that word, but to say it forcefully. If, on the other hand, one does not agree, it must also be stated clearly. We cannot pretend that that article is not there except to make a philological observation as a professor. We are not an academy we are a party and we have a deputy secretary who, I think, we need to help become a secretary, possibly without disgracing him first at the start (there are already many engaged in this purpose).
Yes or no? If so then we need to pay attention to it. If not, I don’t understand why we voted for it in July. That is the question. And on this issue I believe that you should clarify with him. So that there is no ambiguity.
For the rest I agree and you will not lack my support, Massimo
*The article has been translated based on the content of Rss l'Espresso by espresso.repubblica.it. If there is any problem regarding the content, copyright, please leave a report below the article. We will try to process as quickly as possible to protect the rights of the author. Thank you very much!
*We just want readers to access information more quickly and easily with other multilingual content, instead of information only available in a certain language.
*We always respect the copyright of the content of the author and always include the original link of the source article.If the author disagrees, just leave the report below the article, the article will be edited or deleted at the request of the author. Thanks very much! Best regards!