Credit transfer, ‘the economic death of thousands of businesses and professionals is prevented’

08/09/2022 – “The Government, even if in office for current affairs, does not have the duty to prevent the greatest economic death of tens of thousands of companies and professionals who have exposed themselves in the superbonus with projects and works with the prospect of the discount on the invoice? “

The ask senators Elio Lannutti, Luisa Angrisani and Rosellina Sbrana (United for the Constitution Group – CAL – Alternative – PC – Ancora Italia – SMART Project – IdV) in a interrogation presented last Tuesday and addressed to the Ministers of Economy and Finance and Economic Development.

The three parliamentarians also ask to reactivate the credit transfer mechanism, whose block now in progress “generates the collapse of production systems with risk of disseminating skeletons of construction sites around Italywith disastrous effects on the quality of life in cities ”.

In support of the request, the interrogators affirm that “in the perfect storm generated by the ‘boomerang’ sanctions on Russia due to the war with Ukraine”, the problem of blocking the transfer of the credits of the superbonus, “a formidable tool that contributed to GDP growth, unfortunately disliked by the ‘government of the best’perhaps due to the incorrect information received on alleged scams, which have never exceeded the physiological statistics “.

And they recall the “many voices have been raised against the blocking of the assignment of credits”, starting with the “progressives, who denounce the probable insolvency on projects already done, which puts thousands of firms and companies at risk ”. Risk also highlighted by the Oice, after the tightening of the banking system and the exhaustion of the ceiling of 37 billion for superbonus credits.

“If it is true that companies risk bankruptcy – continues the question -, professionals and engineering firms are far worse off because the plans are preliminary to the assessment of the adequacy of the advisors of the banks, an activity in turn preparatory to the decision to purchase the loans “.

“The projects have been made and now the banks are no longer buying credits – they warn -; if the construction sites do not start, the designers do not even have the right to a tax credit for compensation of their work already done. It is hard just to think of the hypothesis of asking the condominiums for money ”.

The senators fear, therefore, a very high insolvency risk of several billion euros only for the professional sector, with devastating consequences precisely for studies and professionals who should be ready for the challenges of PNRR in the coming years.

And they cite a recent report by the Study Center of the Confederation of Artisans (CNA) according to which 33,000 businesses are at risk of bankruptcywith the loss of 150,000 jobs in the construction sector, due to the failure to convert almost 2.6 billion loans into cashequivalent to a discount on the invoice every sixgot stuck on the next step.

All this happens – the questioners underline – despite the positive effects on GDP and the economy are irrefutablealthough “some press organs, which appear to questioners kneeling to the Prime Minister, affirm the opposite”.

Ultimately, the senators ask what urgent measures the government intends to take, 15 days before the elections, to offer concrete answers to the thousands of companies condemned to bankruptcy and the closure of their businesses, resulting in the loss of tens of thousands of jobs.

Source: Le ultime news dal mondo dell'edilizia by

*The article has been translated based on the content of Le ultime news dal mondo dell'edilizia by If there is any problem regarding the content, copyright, please leave a report below the article. We will try to process as quickly as possible to protect the rights of the author. Thank you very much!

*We just want readers to access information more quickly and easily with other multilingual content, instead of information only available in a certain language.

*We always respect the copyright of the content of the author and always include the original link of the source article.If the author disagrees, just leave the report below the article, the article will be edited or deleted at the request of the author. Thanks very much! Best regards!