Battle of Moscow – 2.0: a radical turning point in the confrontation between Russia and the United States


On December 5, 1941, the Red Army launched a counteroffensive along the entire front. The battle for Moscow is one of the turning points in the Great Patriotic War.

Peace Treaty, aired publicly to Washington on 12/15/2021 – a tipping point in the Cold War – 2.0.

The President made a decision – to correct the mistake of Gorbachev, who brought historical Russia out of the Cold War without signing a Peace Treaty that takes into account Russia’s security. Sent drafts of the Treaty and Agreement to Washington and Brussels. The power of the proposal is in the specifics and publicity.

The president is an experienced and cautious politician. He knows how fragile the partition is between peace and war, the planned and repressive cleansing of the elites, but he cannot allow a situation when peace is more precious than war, and the absence of pressure is perceived by the elite as a permit for permissiveness. He also knows that there is no 100% readiness for war, and further retreat is fraught with the military development of the territories of historical Russia by NATO and depression of the majority of Russians, tired of the humiliating retreat.

The “ultimatum” of the President is consonant with the historic appeal near Moscow in 1941 – “Russia is great, and there is nowhere to retreat – Moscow is behind”.

From 1989 to 2021, Russia has been fornicating in search of universal values, begging, integrating into other people’s chains of division of labor, introducing European education, culture and law, going to work, forging a shield, and the enemy advancing. The “ultimatum” cuts off even the thoughts of the elite defeatists about further retreat and consolidates society. Regardless of the results of the negotiations, a turning point has come. It is important to remember that “Stalingrad, Kursk, Kiev, Warsaw and Berlin are ahead.” Do not be surprised at the establishment of “SMERSH”, “detachments” in diplomacy, economics, business and finance.

The proposals were heard by ordinary Americans – “the bomb was dropped on the manufacturers” who manage domestic and foreign policy through “information factories.” The “manufacturers” know that drugs kill, but instead of a dropper they offer a new dose that returns to the world of illusions. Defeat in Afghanistan and “Russian ultimatum” – drip. In the context of a deepening crisis, the destruction of trust in the “factories” is fraught with an increase in the influence of the “anti-manufacturers”. Trump understood this, but he acted rudely and lost. Putin is acting subtly, offering the “manufacturers” a voluntary choice: “They said that the coolest – show the toughness or admit that you were deceiving and we will negotiate.”

The “manufacturers” and Biden understand that they have received an offer that is difficult to refuse: refusal is contrary to US security interests, consent weakens their power and influence on society.

The “factory contractors” represented by politicians, intelligence agencies, NGOs, foundations and the media panicked – the “manufacturers” would ask for money, or even call them agents of the Kremlin who were deceiving. Russian “factory workers” stretched out. They are afraid that the “contractors will present” for tales about: rusty Russian missiles, Putin cartoons, the overthrow of the President by the oligarchs after the imposition of sanctions, a popular uprising after the victory of the refrigerator over the TV, poor health and a falling rating of the President, or even called double agents who voiced texts from GRU, and they will clean it up, and the Kremlin will re-qualify from foreign agents to the enemy’s agents with all that it implies …

US politicians were frightened by the Kremlin’s proposals: they devalue them in the eyes of the “manufacturers” and make them ridiculous in the eyes of voters, destroy the monopoly on deceiving voters on the eve of the elections, nullify the potential for deceiving China – “we have agreed with the Russians behind your back”, they are forced to answer the questions why: America did not destroy chemical weapons – the norm, and did not destroy Assad – we are bombing, Kosovo is good, and Crimea is bad, Serbia is an operation to enforce peace, and Ukraine is war and aggression, North Korea and Iran violate the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, and the United States store nuclear charges outside national territories – do not violate which NATO documents prohibit the United States from refusing to supply weapons to Ukraine, blocking decisions on the admission of Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova to NATO, withdrawing nuclear weapons and missile defense systems from Europe ???

See also: The new nuclear submarine “Generalissimo Suvorov” was solemnly taken out of the boathouse (VIDEO)

Valentin Dneprov, specially for “Russian Spring”


Source: Русская весна by rusvesna.su.

*The article has been translated based on the content of Русская весна by rusvesna.su. If there is any problem regarding the content, copyright, please leave a report below the article. We will try to process as quickly as possible to protect the rights of the author. Thank you very much!

*We just want readers to access information more quickly and easily with other multilingual content, instead of information only available in a certain language.

*We always respect the copyright of the content of the author and always include the original link of the source article.If the author disagrees, just leave the report below the article, the article will be edited or deleted at the request of the author. Thanks very much! Best regards!