Another difficult victory for Van Gerwen

Both gentlemen immediately set the tone by both opening with a maximum score. Van Gerwen was then the first to place a break in the third leg. After that, the Dutchman immediately cashed in on that break, but forgot to make a hole with three arrows in his hand for the double: 3-2.

sloppy game

After the break, Van Gerwen got off to a good start by throwing a 110 finish and then managed to break again. However, the game wasn’t great. The legs were won after 17 and 19 darts. Again the man from Vlijmen was unable to make the hole bigger and so ‘The Asp’ was able to break back and helped himself into the saddle by brushing 130 off the board through the bullseye. Unfortunately, the man from Stockport couldn’t prevent Van Gerwen from going to the second session: 6-4.

There was a small revival in leg thirteen. Van Gerwen managed to place a break with a 13-darter and so the difference was again three legs. Unfortunately, both ruffs then fell back into sloppy play with leg number fourteen as the low point. Many doubles were missed on both sides and the decision had to be made via the double 1. That battle was won by Van Gerwen and that apparently gave some self-confidence. The two-time winner of the World Matchplay went on to take a 10-5 lead.

Low tension

That wide lead was too big for the 30-year-old Aspinall to bridge. The Englishman seemed to bring some tension into the game by winning two more legs in a row, but with the finish in sight Van Gerwen shifted a little and decided the game in his favor. The Dutchman is back in the semi-finals of the World Matchplay for the first time since 2016, the year in which Van Gerwen also won the tournament. In that semi-final, Peter Wright is his opponent who won against Michael Smith earlier in the evening.

Source: RTL Nieuws by

*The article has been translated based on the content of RTL Nieuws by If there is any problem regarding the content, copyright, please leave a report below the article. We will try to process as quickly as possible to protect the rights of the author. Thank you very much!

*We just want readers to access information more quickly and easily with other multilingual content, instead of information only available in a certain language.

*We always respect the copyright of the content of the author and always include the original link of the source article.If the author disagrees, just leave the report below the article, the article will be edited or deleted at the request of the author. Thanks very much! Best regards!