Suara.com – One of the former Democrat Party cadres who submitted a judicial review of the Democratic AD/ART to the Supreme Court (MA) chose to revoke his rights as an applicant or plaintiff. This was claimed by the Democratic Party under the leadership of Agus Harimurti Yudhoyono (AHY).
“Petitioner 2 (Nur Rahmat Sigit Purwanto) there (the Supreme Court) has withdrawn his application,” said Democratic Party Lawyer Hamdan Zoelva at the Democratic Party’s DPP Office, Central Jakarta, Monday (11/10/2021).
Hamdan in his presentation showed a certificate of revocation of rights as Nur’s applicant. Judging from his statement, it was stated that the reason for Nur’s withdrawal was that the submission of the judicial review was deemed to have an impact on democracy.
“So these are new facts, after they realized that they got real information from the PD about what happened in the congress, they withdrew their application,” he said.
Also Read: Opponents of Moeldoko Cs, AHY’s camp proposes to be the Respondent in the PD’s Judicial Review Lawsuit
As for the certificate shown by Hamdan Zoelva et al, it looks like it was made on September 29, 2021, it was signed on a stamp duty.
The letter was submitted to the MA by Nur directly. It can be seen that the written letter has been received by the Supreme Court on October 6, 2021.
Previously, Constitutional Law expert Yusril Ihza Mahendra accompanied four Democrat members of the Deli KLB camp Serdang Moeldoko to submit a judicial review regarding the 2020 Democratic Articles of Association / Bylaws (AD / ART) to the Supreme Court (MA).
Yusril himself said the judicial review included formal and material testing of the 2020 Democratic Party’s Articles of Association and Bylaws (AD/RT), which was ratified by the Minister of Law and Human Rights on 18 May 2020.
Also Read: Long time no see, Annisa Pohan is busy taking care of family
“Advocates Yusril Ihza Mahendra and Yuri Kemal Fadlullah confirmed the media’s question that their law office IHZA & IHZA LAW FIRM SCBD-BALI OFFICE represented the legal interests of four members of the Democratic Party submitting a judicial review to the Supreme Court,” Yusril said in his statement as quoted by Suara.com. , Friday (24/9/2021).
Yusril said that the step to examine the formal and material AD/ART of political parties is a new thing in Indonesian law. He himself argued that the Supreme Court had the authority to examine the AD/ART of a political party because the AD/ART was made by a political party at the behest of the law and a delegation given the Law on Political Parties.
“Well, if the AD/ART of a political party turns out to be the procedure for its formation and the regulatory material is contrary to the law, even contrary to the 1945 Constitution, then what institution has the authority to examine and cancel it? There is a legal vacuum to resolve the above problems,” he said.
He explained that the Party Court, which is a quasi-party internal judiciary, has no authority to examine the AD/ART. Likewise, the District Court, which has the authority to adjudicate internal political party disputes that cannot be resolved by the Party Court, is not authorized to examine the AD/ART.
Source: Suara.com – Informasi Berita Terkini dan Terbaru Hari Ini by www.suara.com.
*The article has been translated based on the content of Suara.com – Informasi Berita Terkini dan Terbaru Hari Ini by www.suara.com. If there is any problem regarding the content, copyright, please leave a report below the article. We will try to process as quickly as possible to protect the rights of the author. Thank you very much!
*We just want readers to access information more quickly and easily with other multilingual content, instead of information only available in a certain language.
*We always respect the copyright of the content of the author and always include the original link of the source article.If the author disagrees, just leave the report below the article, the article will be edited or deleted at the request of the author. Thanks very much! Best regards!