According to Judge Kliment, the recordings from the cottage are legal. They burdened Par – Home – News

“The right to a fair trial is despite the fact that the evidence was obtained illegally,” said Judge Juraj Kliment.

VIDEO: Lawyer Marek Para will be prosecuted in custody.

Prominent lawyer Marek Para is in custody. He was sent there by the Supreme Court, which thus changed the decision of the Specialized Criminal Court. According to Senate President Juraj Kliment, he is in custody so as not to influence witnesses. Whenever Kliment mentioned the word bond, he glared at Para. He had already spent two nights in a police cell and told reporters that “he already knows what it’s like to be on the other side.”

According to the court, the fear of influencing witnesses is mainly the former director of the anti-corruption unit, Robert Krajmer, whom Para also represents as a lawyer. Para also represents Nitra oligarch Norbert Bödör and former police president Tibor Gašpar, as well as convicted Marian Kočner. They were allegedly at the head of the criminal group and with them Para was to cooperate in discrediting the Prosecutor of the Special Prosecutor’s Office, Vasil Špirek.

Judge Kliment emphasized that the crown witness of the case against Par was the public prosecutor Špirko, who had already testified in the case. NAKA in the case mapped Par’s movement at the police presidium. Former head of the financial unit Bernard Slobodník spoke, for example, about how he met Par directly in the office of the then head of NAKA. From the e-book of visits, the police monitored Par’s visits to the presidium for a minute. He also had to deal with Prosecutor Špirek with the then head of the elite unit, Peter Hrašek. In addition, they also watched Špirek. Former chief of tax criminals Ľudovít Makó testifies to this.

VIDEO: Mandzák: I consider the Supreme Court’s decision to be illegal.

“The reopening of this investigation is a message to everyone that no such act will go unresolved in the future and specific criminal liability will be inferred. It is a raised finger for those who would like to continue this trend, “said Kliment. According to Michal Mandzák, the defendant of the accused Par, the chairman of the senate documented his bias with this speech.

NAKA detained attorney Para together with ex-interior minister Robert Kaliňák on Wednesday, April 20. While Kaliňák was detained in the Twilight operation, Para faces charges in the Kaifáš action. He is accused of the crime of founding, conceiving and supporting a criminal group.

May, interrogation time

Witness hearings are scheduled for May in these cases. Slobodník, Ľuboš Varga, Hraško, Gašpar, his son Gašpar Jr., Bödör, as well as his father Miroslav, former special prosecutor Dušan Kováčik and Krajmer will be heard. According to the Supreme Court, this should probably be a sufficient time for the detention itself for Para.

According to Kliment’s words, investigator Peter Merkovský from NAKA, lawyer Alexandra Kokavcová, Vasil Špirko, as well as Marian Kočner are also due to be heard. Kliment reminded that the lawyer is convicted by a communication from Kočner’s Threema, but also by the testimony of Makó and also Slobodník. According to the Supreme Court, these are sufficient grounds for detention.

The Senate of the Supreme Court does not agree with the decision of the Nitra Regional Court, which ruled that the recordings made last year at a hunting lodge near Nitra are illegal. The President of the Chamber, Kliment, refers to the precedent of the European Court of Justice of 2021. “The right to a fair trial is despite the fact that the evidence was obtained illegally – ie without the consent of the court, if it did not result in the overall conduct being unfair,” he stressed. Kliment.

“It was an unprecedented exchange of information,” the prosecutor thinks. “The solid structure of the criminal group is also the reason for the accused’s collusive activities,” he added. “Fico said,” an hour after Para was taken into custody. He said Senate President Kliment was biased. “Para is an extremely important lawyer in publicized political cases,” he said. defense, ”says Fico, likening the process to fascist crap.

Who isn’t interested yet?

According to investigator Para, he deliberately helped members of the criminal group, which, according to Kliment, was to be led by the younger of the Bödörovs. The resolution on the accusation states that in July 2016, by mutual agreement, he should have deliberately created a situation that would allow prosecutor Vasil Špirek to be prosecuted.

“In order to prevent the performance of the prosecutor’s supervision at least in the criminal case concerning the supply of information technology of the Ministry of the Interior and also in the case concerning BA HAUS, for which the accused used the businessman Ľuboš Varga,” the resolution said.

Monday’s Supreme Court decision Parov’s lawyer Mandzák considers “illegal”. “There is no justification for the accusation and no specific collusive activity. The Supreme Court’s decision is based solely on assumptions and hypotheses, “the lawyer said.

At the beginning of the hearing, the prosecuted lawyer objected to the bias of the President of the Supreme Court, Kliment. However, the Senate ruled that it was not biased.

Source: Pravda – Správy by

*The article has been translated based on the content of Pravda – Správy by If there is any problem regarding the content, copyright, please leave a report below the article. We will try to process as quickly as possible to protect the rights of the author. Thank you very much!

*We just want readers to access information more quickly and easily with other multilingual content, instead of information only available in a certain language.

*We always respect the copyright of the content of the author and always include the original link of the source article.If the author disagrees, just leave the report below the article, the article will be edited or deleted at the request of the author. Thanks very much! Best regards!